Autore:
Maniaci, Giorgio Titolo:
Il principio metodologico assente. Perchè i giudici non sembrano argomentare in modo sufficientemente razionale e perchè, invece, dovrebbero farloPeriodico:
Ragion praticaAnno:
2011 - Fascicolo:
37 - Pagina iniziale:
459 - Pagina finale:
482In this work, I will defend two thesis. First, it seems not possible to reconstruct the content of many judicial motivations, elaborated in many Constitutional States, as a chain of arguments which is logically o rationally correct. The reason is that there is not often a general and normative premise in the external justification of the major premise of decisional syllogism. Secondly, I will argue that the judicial motivation, under certain conditions, could likely be and should be logically or rationally justified.
SICI: 1720-2396(2011)37<459:IPMAPI>2.0.ZU;2-I
Testo completo:
http://www.mulino.it/ws/rwDirectDownload.php?doi=10.1415/35680Testo completo alternativo:
http://www.mulino.it/rivisteweb/scheda_articolo.php?id_articolo=35680Esportazione dati in Refworks (solo per utenti abilitati)
Record salvabile in Zotero
Biblioteche ACNP che possiedono il periodico