Autore: Dorssemont, Filip
Titolo: La non promozione del dialogo sociale europeo: osservazioni sul caso EPSU
Periodico: Lavoro e diritto
Anno: 2020 - Fascicolo: 3 - Pagina iniziale: 519 - Pagina finale: 538

The EPSU judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2019 constitutesa major setback in the history of the European Social Dialogue.It demonstrates that two major EU institutions (the Commission and theCourt of Justice) have failed to recognize and promote the role of thesocial partners at its level, as is being prescribed in Article 152 TFEU. The approach of the General Court is criticized for its choice to give priorityto provisions empowering institutions instead of European citizens.It fails to understand the rationale behind the institutionalisation of theEuropean Social Dialogue as a technique to strengthen the role of theEuropean legislator by creating a conflict between the role of the EuropeanCommission and the role of social partners and disqualifiying thedirective implementing agreements as a legislative act. Last but not least,the Court tends to reduce subsidiarity to its vertical dimension and hasfailed to do justice to the need to reduce inequality in the field of informationand consultation rights.




SICI: 1120-947X(2020)3<519:LNPDDS>2.0.ZU;2-E
Testo completo: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1441/98126
Testo completo alternativo: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1441/98126

Esportazione dati in Refworks (solo per utenti abilitati)

Biblioteche ACNP che possiedono il periodico